Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Price keeps rising
Bait and Switch App — As I made reservations for travel on a Flix bus the Wanderu app up charged me four times. The original price was below $100. After receiving messages that this route was having increasing demand the price ended up…
Excellent - save one aspect — Truly does seem to be carrier-agnostic, been relying on their website for a decade and the app is the same (as usually is the case, app is a bit better than using a site). I am not cool, though, with the…
Bait and switch — Trying to book a bus ticket, multiple times I clicked on a ticket and after directing me to the next screen, the price went up $20-$30. Wanderu will have to change from their scammy marketing tactics before I will…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.