Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 432 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.2.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.2.0, updated 2026-09-29.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
another game that is nothing like the ads. edit: the developer has requested that I find the ad I saw and then it might reflect gameplay that is available to advanced users. no. I'm not going to do that. advertisements for the game should…
Once again I see the same fake ad. 2 or more sides fighting, with troops pouring out of buildings and fighting on the border. Yup, sure wish that was in game. But sadly, just False Advertising. Reply to Devs: Your game is too grindy and…
Between some of the pictures and ads, this game is nothing like them. I would forget the name of this game, months will go by, see a new ad that makes the game enticing, and fooled into downloading the same game as before. I wish there…
Pay to progress
It's a completely pay to win game!! Pay wall is unbearable. To upgrade a unit to lvl 7 u need 980 forge stone. To lvl 8 you need 1980. To lvl 9 I guess a lot more. And it's only one epic unit! You have legendary and mythic also. And you…
Extreme Pay to win game Very high demand for F2p player Unfair Mystic heroes many more......
pay to win or spend years getting levels credit card warriors get in minutes. clan wars are nigh impossible to compete in as it's only top clans and top members, local competition field is fine for 2 rounds then you will be put with…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.