Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Stolen coins — I’ve been watching the required 15 adds per day and saving my coins so I can read longer but every time I check in my balance goes down. In the last couple of weeks hundreds of coins went missing. Well here I am again….love…
Where are my points going!! — I watch 15 ads everyday to earn points only for them to take almost 100 points away every day!!! How fair is that? I can see paying points everyday, but not more than I earn. I will not be using this app…
Not happy — Watched 20 ads and when I went to read book it said I can only read it if I pay for it. Damn I have 10 reading apps and none of them have tried to force me to pay
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.