Recurring review themes noted across 39 scanned reviews — too few to weigh them. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
FAKE- FALSE ADVERTISING — App does NOT measure BLOOD SUGAR, but ad’s verbiage says it does!
FAIL - FALSE and MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT — $9.99 a month… PLUS - it does NOT provide testing or results. You have data enter your own numbers (from your testing device). Easier to just do a listing or spreadsheet.
Doe not measure blood sugar — Misleading ads. Confusing navigation. It’s mostly a string of generic health articles I could read anywhere. Not clear how to log off or cancel.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.