Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 525 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 12.2.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 12.2.1, updated 2026-09-24.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only ā shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
If only the stable wasn't that time consuming to build and the energy regeneration was quicker. I think there will be a lot more players into this and I am sure many newbies won't quit the game. But that's not the case Sadly it will breakā¦
fun and addictive game! although I like it, it can get very hard and frustrating as it takes long times to have enough and the right tools to make stuff that are stronger to be able to gather loot. it gets very frustrating how I keepā¦
love how you can build as big of a base as you want, I got the horse and it is so worth it. Thanks for making this game it's really fun!!! But I do wish progress would go a little faster and if you don't think ahead and have lots ofā¦
Pay to progress
This game sucks now. New players will have a hard time trying to cope with skill tree. Frontier Games is a P2W-fest.
It's very pushing pay to win game, very not fair with you so it squeeze you to pay something in order to make it. For example the random events on the map, you get random events once a day that mostly are way beyond your level, so youā¦
From my experience on this game over 4 Years since I started playing, the game is now going in the Absolute Worst direction, the more updates and the more mechanisms added do nothing but stifling the players to pay to win, Ex. Taming andā¦
Aggressive ad load
app disappointment. unlearalistic and too many ads best to uninstall to save space
The ads are absolutely excessive. You can barely use the app without being interrupted by another commercial. And then the developer wants an unreasonable amount of money to remove the ads. This feels less like a good app with advertisingā¦
I can't able to watch ads could you help me
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read ā user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure ā and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence ā with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation ā and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as āReported by N usersā, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that chargeās own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a modelās confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0ā99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument ā 44.7% of every pair of apps tied ā and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say āNot assessedā because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those ā and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.