Review signals only — 2 user-reported signals — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
Slightly unfair — Hi I really think locking “who liked me” behind a paywall feels insensitive, it can block genuine connections before they even start which is frustrating for both people. I’d love if you could reconsider that feature or…
Buns — YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR EVERYTHING WTH
. — this app genuinely sucks you have to pay for everything it deserves 0 stars
Reviewers describe the free version as usable
🌚 — I believe the app could have potential if you didn’t have to pay to talk to people. I have had the exception of talking to maybe two of them, that of which I’ve messaged first. If you’re looking to chat with people, even if you have…
Pay — Wish I didn’t have to pay to see secret admirers
Wish I didn’t have to pay for + to see requests — This app isn’t bad I just don’t like having to pay for +
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.