DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Woodle Screw® Pin Nuts & Bolts
LONGSEA LINK LIMITED · Games

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 662 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources662 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 1.4.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.4.6, updated 2026-09-24.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 1.4.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.4.5, updated 2026-09-22.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 48 distinct reviewers (29.4% of 163 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (5.5% of 163 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

I really enjoy playing your game, but having to sit thru 2 and 3 minute ads every other game is a no for me. I hope you fix this

5★ · Google Play · 2026-08-08

poorly made cash grab with the following problems: 1 - there are too many ads to be worth what the app offers. 2 - the game goes from incredibly easy to extremely difficult seemingly at random. my guess is it is to get you to pay to…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-05

UPDATE 8/2026: I reinstalled this & now it seems to be working great. I would like an option to eliminate all the between-match-ads. They are getting cumbersome... This worked for awhile but once I reached level 141, I kept getting pop-up…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-08-09

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

the ads for this game are like most games, completely different to what you get. so misleading. it's pathetic.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-25

the add says designed for seniors no annoying adds which is a lie if you have Google then Google imposes the adds went threw 13 levels no adds then it went into a add then lost lol 14 and went to a add so no it's time to delete. if a fame…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-14

I first downloaded this game cause it advertised no ads and offline play, I hate having my time wasted on ads for something I am not going to download anyway and I especially DO NOT LIKE BEING LIED TO. if I could I would sue the pants off…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-17

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 1.4.6 (App Store), 1.4.5 (Google Play)3 independent signals662 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.