Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 769 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.14 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.14.1, updated 2026-09-29.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 3.14, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 3.14.1 · 2026-09-29
Woo-foo, human! We’ve rolled out some small behind-the-scenes updates to keep everything stable and easy to enjoy. Because happier dogs mean happier humans. Yours, Woofz team
Google Play
This analysis describes version 3.14.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.14.1, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
if I could give it no stars, I would. I don't know how I ended up getting charged for this, but they try daily to charge my card. I've gone into my subscriptions in the playstore. No subscription. I've gone into my email. The only emails…
SCAM- DO NOT DOWNLOAD. seems legit but the app will take money without your permission and will not give it back. no refunds issued. no help from support. lies and theft. you cant cancel it in the app, they lock u out. im still fighting…
It seams impossible to cancel , NO SUPPORT at all. Plus its not adapted for your dog its a bunch of back to the basics. No fun and no improvement in a week...
Reports of unexpected charges
As others stated, there is no notification of renewal, so you will be surprise-charged $95. Woofz Terms state, no refunds! and they will not tell you when you'll be charged! and their customer service team will tell you that repeatedly…
Expensive. Charge you us dollars so be careful if ordering from Canada. Auto renew is also hidden away so advance with caution. They got me me for $85 us without my knowledge .I'll try canceling thru my cc. update: please stay away from…
Scam!!!!!!! I signed up for £18.99/quarter That's what it said on my subscription but they took random amounts from my account and now owe me £60 which they are refusing to refund. You can't see your account on the app you have to login…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.