Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 456 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.0.58 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.0.58, updated 2026-09-03.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
I downloaded to play because I saw an add for it while playing another game. What downloaded is a normal yahtzee game, not what the ad showed. The ad showed a large board with tons of dice, looked intriguing. Deleting. False ad.
Does not as advertised. I chose to install it because it looked as if you chose your play from several dice if th happened to be together. So I thought that looks interesting. But it's the typical Yatzy with the roll of five dice. Isn't…
False advertisement nothing in the advertisement is part of the game
Aggressive ad load
another game that seems great until you're done with the tutorial phase. suddenly youre inundated with ads and pop-ups, different game modes and other things that make the game difficult to navigate. it shouldn't take several minutes of…
so sick of downloading games only to be forced to watch ads at every single turn. Once in a while I get, but every single turn or level makes it not worth having. uninstalled in under 5 min after installing because bombarded with ads.
waaaaaay to many ads....then said ads will kick u out of the game and then ur having to sign in over and over again.....yeah hard pass.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.