DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
YouCam Makeup: Face Editor
PERFECT MOBILE CORP. · Photo & Video

What’s the catch? Hard to cancel — 2 independent sources agree, backed by user reviews and the app's own on-screen text.

Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.

2 on the catch list · analyzedConfidence: Low6 signal sources962 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 6.47.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 6.47.0, updated 2026-09-23.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 5.70.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-10-01.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreefrom user reviews and the app's own on-screen textartefact cb506d95a02c…
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
Reported by 47 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Raised by 47 distinct reviewers — 9.0% of the 521 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 5

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 521 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact cb506d95a02c…
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Progress itself is for sale: "Buy Coins"
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (2.9% of 521 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Surprise charges: raised by 28 distinct reviewers (5.4% of 521 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Trial terms not stated in the app's own text
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact cb506d95a02c…
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Trial converts to a charge

I did not want this app nor did I want to purchase it. There is no opt out that I could find. Google play had a pay card it automatically hooked up and charged with no way out of the so called free trial .

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-23

Scam — They forced me to subscribe the annual version and I really didnt want it. They also refuse to dispute the charge although I never used the app agter free trial. The ads were misleading suggesting even after the free trial it will…

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-19

SCAM — I downloaded this app and it didn’t even deliver on the feature that I promised. I canceled two days into my seven day free trial and it’s still charged me $79.99. It has been a nightmare dealing with it. Do not download unless you…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-17

Hard to cancel

Impossible to cancel! — Only purchase this is you plan on paying for the long term. The cancellation process is difficult and even misleading

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-04

Hard to Cancel free trial — I attempted to use the free trial, but it automatically subscribes you to a year account and made it difficult to cancel. This is absolutely unacceptable and frustrating. Very disappointing.

1★ · App Store · 2026-06-09

No way to cancel — I just downloaded this app and it says there’s a 7 day free trial and then you just automatically go on auto renewal for $80 which I do not want and I want to cancel. You can’t find anywhere in the app to cancel. It is…

1★ · App Store · 2026-04-26

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Scam — They forced me to subscribe the annual version and I really didnt want it. They also refuse to dispute the charge although I never used the app agter free trial. The ads were misleading suggesting even after the free trial it will…

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-19

Do not buy it! — This is a bait-and-switch. I paid for Premium, and now you’re charging extra for features that were included when I subscribed. Either honor my subscription or issue a refund. 1 star.

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-24

BUYERS BEWARE — In app purchases for this game are charged double the advertised amount. When this app was just a straightforward annual purchase everything worked perfectly, and I mean it was hands down the best line of editing apps…

2★ · App Store · 2026-05-13

Paywall blocks the basics

This app used to be good, now you have to pay for most of the features.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-23

Pay — Can’t do anything without paying.

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-09

Disappointed — So many features that used to be free are now locked behind a paywall. AI is everywhere now and made the app worse. Literally unusable garbage without giving them more money than is reasonable to pay.

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-17

Reports of unexpected charges

I had canceled my subscription but then got charged anyways, looked at my subscriptions and it was re-subscribed which I did not do, I had deleted the app and considering it was $42 I was pretty upset. so they have sneaky ways of charging…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-01

I was charged for a subscription that I never made!!!

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-05

Sneaky charges — They charged my credit card thru my Apple account without my permission

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-28

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions10
Premium Version (Monthly)Monthly$5.99
Premium Version (Monthly)Monthly$9.99
Premium Version (Monthly)Monthly$8.99
Pro Monthly OfferMonthly$19.99
Premium Version (Yearly)Yearly$32.99
Premium Version (Yearly)Yearly$39.99
Pro Yearly OfferYearly$79.99
Premium Version (Yearly)Yearly$31.99
Pro Yearly Offer with Free TrialYearly$79.99
Pro Year Offer with Pro FeaturesYearly$79.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 6.47.0 (App Store), 5.70.4 (Google Play)6 independent signals962 reviews scannedConfidence: LowNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.