DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Zen Color - Color By Number
Oakever Games · Games

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 2,691 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: Medium3 signal sources2,691 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-06
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 2.2.9 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.2.9, updated 2026-09-17.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 2.2.10 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.2.10, updated 2026-09-25.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
Reported by 81 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Raised by 81 distinct reviewers — 3.9% of the 2,078 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.1% of 613 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

You have to watch an ad every time it changes screens. also there are pop up ads attached to the bottom of the page. if you need a hint of where a hidden color is, you have to watch an ad sometimes two. although it is a free app, it is…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-10

Unskippable Ads are UNACCEPTABLE and i just got 3 in a row. I'm fine with looking at your ads for 30 seconds but when an ad MAKES me play with it just to get a link to the Play store, then it still doesn't give me a "close" button, that's…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-09-09

The relaxing music is nice, but the areas are so small, you can't see them without a magnifying glass. They're also a very light gray. Extremely hard to see when their small. Don't play this unless you have perfect vision. Also, way to…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-11

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

they were telling no ad and full of ad after each game and wi-fi is very important if there is no wi-fi then we can not play the game they are showing fake ads don't believe them

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-06

I downloaded the app because your ad had illustrated letters to color. There wasn't even one....I looked through the whole collection. That's false advertising.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-26

False advertising. it says in the ads that there's no ads in game yet one pops up anyway. would have given more stars if this was an honest game. uninstalling.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-26

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-06 Version analyzed: 2.2.9 (App Store), 2.2.10 (Google Play)3 independent signals2,691 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.