Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 926 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 4.5.85 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.5.85, updated 2026-09-28.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 4.5.85 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.5.85, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
I signed up for a free trial that was supposed to last 3 days and they charged me a week's amount. they say there is a no refund policy but I will be calling tomorrow to complain.
Refund Issues — I downloaded the app “Zutobi” expecting a free trial, but after the three days I was unfortunately charged $7.99 plus tax. I tried to resolve the issue with Apple Support and somehow they also couldn’t provide a refund or…
Can’t get out of this “free trial” thing — Based on everyone else here experiencing this, I’m so glad I didn’t even considered purchasing this 3 day free trial as it appears folks have cancelled it and still are being charged! THIEVES!
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Not free — It advertises as if it is a free driving test app but when you actually get into it, it won’t let you start none of the lessons until you pay. Don’t waste your money.
Misleading ‘Free’ App Advertising — Advertised as a free app, but you can’t actually use it without being pushed into a subscription/free trial immediately. There’s no clear option to continue for free, which feels misleading and…
False Advertising — Keeps trying to charge me 2 dollars to download it even though it’s free
Paywall blocks the basics
If I could write less stars I would. you cant do anything in the app without paying for something.
I had it at a 5. But on the first lesson in the module, I was only able to do a couple of questions, and then the last two I couldn't do. You have to pay for premium just to any of the tests. Worst app ever. Couldn't even practice or…
locked behind a subscription. most people trying to learn how to drive are presumably teenagers with no job, so why is there a paywall for people that dont got no money??
Reports of unexpected charges
the app itself is fine however I am still being charged $7.99 a week and I've already canceled it through Google Play and I can't cancel it again because it's already canceled I've paid $7.99 twice after I've canceled. I don't know how to…
still taking my money while my card is locked after I Uninstalled this app
I signed up for a free trial that was supposed to last 3 days and they charged me a week's amount. they say there is a no refund policy but I will be calling tomorrow to complain.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 9 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.