Appworthy

開心捕魚3 - 街機打魚遊戲 gametower

最受華人喜愛的捕魚遊戲《開心捕魚》， 在玩家瘋狂期盼下推出《開心捕魚 3》！ 【最受歡迎的捕魚遊戲】 ★明星三缺一專業團隊最新力作，最奇幻的深海冒險…

International Games System Co., Ltd.
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating4.4★24.8K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age12+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperInternational Games System Co., Ltd.

What we found

Full report

Too little checked to say Only 229 reviews read, too few to say.

Money

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.

This analysis describes version 5.2.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 5.2.6, updated 2026-09-15.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

最受華人喜愛的捕魚遊戲《開心捕魚》，

在玩家瘋狂期盼下推出《開心捕魚 3》！

【最受歡迎的捕魚遊戲】

★明星三缺一專業團隊最新力作，最奇幻的深海冒險！

★風行日、韓經典機台全面移植，讓您走到哪，玩到哪!

★奇幻風格、精緻亮麗的畫面，操作簡單、輕鬆上手!

★多樣關卡、魚種、強力武器任您體驗，海量金幣賺不完!

★大獎賽制！隨開即玩！運氣爆棚！賭神來也不是對手！

☆【玩法介紹】

1. 《經典捕魚，萬人線上》

經典3D街機移植，BOSS多樣玩法不同，畫面真實，4人順暢即時連線！

2. 《覺醒海王，秒秒爆擊》

海王覺醒進化，倍率極高，浮動倍率，金幣拿到你手軟！

3. 《捕魚原創，妖怪狩獵》

原創的橫向妖怪狩獵玩法，獨特的『傳奇』、『天照』系統，等您來體驗！

4. 《萌翻全場，恐龍世界》

獨特3D玩法，免費遊戲『暴龍來襲』、『龍星城市』，包你發大財！

5. 《萬種炮台，特殊技能》

全捕魚遊戲中最多炮台，最多特殊的射擊方式，尋找最適合您的土豪神炮！

6. 《領航員船艦，強化技能卡》

原創領航員船艦養成，加強技能卡持續時間，一張技能當兩張用，強化如此簡單！

【遊戲特色】

☆天天登入瘋狂送金幣，全民角子共玩娛樂！

☆免費任務、豪神活動，獎金翻倍拿！厚李金猴爺啦！

☆突破傳統！開著船艦悠遊大海，享受一砲捕魚的快感！

☆絢麗多變的魚群！特殊陣型組合，宅神爺在身邊金銀財寶裝滿盆！

☆激烈競賽！滿天繁星城池多財，挑戰瞬間致富的成為滿貫大亨！

☆全新模組『妖怪』、『恐龍』接踵來襲，讓你金好運氣，您還在等什麼？

還在等什麼？快點擊「安裝」一起加入《開心捕魚 3》吧！

更多開心捕魚遊戲內容請至

官方FB粉絲團：http://goo.gl/DW1K2X

喜愛捕魚的就要玩《開心捕魚 3》，

不愛捕魚的更要玩《開心捕魚 3》，

《開心捕魚 3》絕對讓您有不一樣的捕魚體驗！

馬上下載遊戲，爆富發發發！老子有錢了！

☆遊戲以成年人為訴求對象。

☆遊戲不提供「現金交易賭博」，也沒有機會贏得現金或實體獎品。

☆在社交類遊戲中的練習狀況或成就，不代表日後在「現金交易賭博」中會獲得成功

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 0 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

229 reviews read · 0 review-based observations

No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 5.2.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 5.2.6, updated 2026-09-15.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 5.2.6 · 2026-09-15

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
3-google-com-igs-fish
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
229
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 229 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 5.2.63 independent signals229 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.39 ★ · 24,833 ratings
Version
5.2.6
Updated
15 Sep 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
International Games System Co., Ltd.
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction