Some warnings 8 users report a free trial turning into a charge. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.44.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.44.0, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Achieve your weight loss and muscle gain goals with 30 Days Fitness Challenge!
No equipment? No problem! We provide personalized home workout plans and professional guides. Say goodbye to excuses and hello to a healthier you. Get ready to reach your fitness goals with us, your trusted AI coach.
Get your desired shape with ease! We offer a wide variety of workout plans and a vast library of exercises, targeting every area. Customized workouts are also available, whether you want to lose weight or gain muscle, we've got you covered.
See incredible results in just 30 days! Sweat it out now and discover a fitter you!
Work out where you are and when you want.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 63 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
False advertisement — I was supposed to get a week free trial of this and I was charged on the 2nd day after downloading. That is not ok. If you are no longer offering the week free trial to people then you should have that posted or take…
Free trial??? — I was immediately charged without the free trial even starting! This is the first time I’ve ever had this issue. I don’t even want this since I can’t cast/mirror it on my tv. How can this be corrected???
7 day free trial is a scam — When you sign up, it says you get a 7 day free trial - but I tired to cancel 2 days in and they had already billed me and would not refund me. Support was unwilling to help and told me to call Apple! Ugh. Stay…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.44.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.44.0, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
• Overall experience improvements • Minor bug fixes
Appworthy
30-day-fitness-at-homeAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.