Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 126 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.5.20 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.5.20, updated 2026-10-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Your reliable way to find short-term homes in Korea.
33m2 is Korea’s No.1 short-term rental app
helping you find and lease weekly and monthly stays safely and conveniently.
● Stay for the exact period you need
· Browse one-room studio units, officetels, and apartments across Korea
· Also find residences, hotels, guesthouses, and vacation rentals
· Rent from a minimum of 1 week, with flexible extensions for as long as you need
● Reasonable and transparent pricing
· A simple, flat security deposit of 330,000 KRW
· Lower rental costs than hotels or BnB options
· Service fees unimaginably lower than traditional real estate brokerage
● Safe and secure lease system
· Escrow payment system that ensures payout after move-in
· Deposits safely held and returned by 33m2
· View real reviews from previous tenants…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The store privacy disclosure (1 entry) names no tracking or advertising use, but the package ships 2 advertising/tracking SDKs: Airbridge, Firebase Analytics
Tracking or advertising SDKs are present in the package that the store's own privacy disclosure does not account for.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 5 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:83640b33c21a71bc2ed283e22948f5d08012eec1f2987ad662bd769daccc6e3aOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "%s까지 취소 시"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:83640b33c21a71bc2ed283e22948f5d08012eec1f2987ad662bd769daccc6e3aNo review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.5.20, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.5.20 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.5.20, updated 2026-10-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
33m2Assessed 2026-10-27 from 126 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.