Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
Appworthy

7NOW: Food & Drinks Delivery

Order Alcohol Food & More 24/7

7-Eleven, Inc.
No findings published
Download on theApp Store
App Store rating4.7★167.6K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age17+Store age rating
Size295 MBiPhone download
CategoryLifestyle
Developer7-Eleven, Inc.

At a glance

Full report

Things to watch for 0

Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.

Positives 0

No specific positive published.

From our automated analysis, 6 Oct 2026.

This analysis describes version 5.2609.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.2609.0, updated 2026-09-21.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Why You’ll Love 7NOW:

You can now use your SNAP EBT card to pay for eligible items directly in the app. SNAP covers approved food items only and can’t be used for delivery fees, tips, or non-food products. Our updated checkout makes split payments easy — use SNAP for eligible items and another card for everything else. This update makes shopping smoother and more accessible than ever. Available in select locations only.

7-Eleven Gold Pass™: Enjoy $0 delivery fees, discounted pricing for students, free drinks, 10% 7-Eleven Cash, and more.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

0 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Reports of unexpected charges

One source only

Surprise charges: raised by 24 distinct reviewers (6.5% of 370 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

370 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

370 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Reports of unexpected charges

Shown, not confirmed

How could the service be worse can’t it’s horrible — I was looking for cigarettes and multiple other over the last three days and I still have nothing except for disputed charges for where you charge me for stuff I didn’t receive…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-09

PS7 of apps — Worst. One might think they have decent/ok products. Try to buy it. They take your money and won’t let you have or touch what you bought or have your money back. The store workers will be rude to you. I call it the ps7 of…

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-27

Never subscribe — $5.95 charged months after cancelled repeatedly, had to cancel card.

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-07

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 6 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 5.2609.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.2609.0, updated 2026-09-21.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 5.2609.0 · 2026-09-21
We constantly make updates to the 7NOW app to enhance the experience for our customers. We've also addressed a few underlying issues to give you the most seamless experience possible.   Love 7NOW? Leave a review to help us improve!

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
7now-apple-1316244211
Assessment date
6 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
370
Package examined
No package scan
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-06 from 370 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-06 Version analyzed: 5.2609.03 independent signals370 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.74 ★ · 167,567 ratings
Version
5.2609.0
Updated
21 Sep 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
17+
Size
295 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
7-Eleven, Inc.
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction