A Word Best Puzzle Game "A Word", unlike classic vocabulary games, gives you…
Apps Mobile GamesSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 212 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.10.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 3.10.6, updated 2023-12-09.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A Word Best Puzzle Game
"A Word", unlike classic vocabulary games, gives you a more complex and fun gaming experience. The aim is to FIND HIDDEN WORDS appropriate to the subject given in the puzzle consisting of hexagon letters, to collect points and badges. Swipe your finger across the letters to spell the hidden words! With "A Word" you can hunt words, practice intelligence and brain exercises. "A Word" Game is designed for anyone who likes word puzzles and word games. With this game you can easily improve your vocabulary, concentration and spelling skills.
"A Word" Game presents you with 550 puzzles and thousands of hidden words that are getting harder and harder. As you progress through the game, you can open the locked achievements, compete with your friends on the scoreboard, or win 12 different badges in stages. Increase your points by competing against time.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 13 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Chartboost, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 9 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f7ddfdfe2b4a843f9fe1322846d58c78e4d11c0905133372aa10a0099011a4d1Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:f7ddfdfe2b4a843f9fe1322846d58c78e4d11c0905133372aa10a0099011a4d1The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:f7ddfdfe2b4a843f9fe1322846d58c78e4d11c0905133372aa10a0099011a4d1The app's own text says: "View the ad you saved when you were offline"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:f7ddfdfe2b4a843f9fe1322846d58c78e4d11c0905133372aa10a0099011a4d1No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.10.6, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.10.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 3.10.6, updated 2023-12-09.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
a-word-gameAssessed 2026-10-26 from 212 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.