Some warnings 5 users report tracking or data-collection worries. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 15.15 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 15.15, updated 2026-08-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
If you deal with painful periods, mood swings, PMDD, PCOS, endometriosis, or mystery symptoms that disrupt your life, you're not alone, and you don't have to just "deal with it."
Aavia helps you understand your pain, find what actually works, and advocate for the care you deserve. Track your patterns, get personalized relief recommendations, and finally connect the dots between your symptoms and your cycle.
Proudly women & AAPI-owned. For all people with ovaries. Built with leading OBGYNs.
YOUR PAIN DESERVES ANSWERS:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 4.99 to USD 109.00 — a 22x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Data & privacy concerns: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 100 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Full of ads and inaccurate — Have been using this for 2 years and it’s never once been accurate in predicting my period. Also have watched it become completely infiltrated with ads on every section. Truly horrible and only still on it bc…
No email sign up — Finally, an app that doesn’t require me to give my email so they can sell my info! Literally, every other hormone or cycle app I downloaded started with me entering my email and creating an account, except this one. I…
Does not track right? — i’ve had this app for a little while since flo is apparently not too good (sells your data) and it’s personally not for me. It always predicts my period wrong so much to the point where I have just been predicting…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 15.15 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 15.15, updated 2026-08-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Aavia is built with our doctors & members! This update includes some optimizations.
Appworthy
aaviaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.