The Acropolis of Athens The world´s most famous citadel, the Acropolis of Ath…
Mozaik EducationToo little checked to say Only 219 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.32 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.32, updated 2026-05-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The Acropolis of Athens
The world´s most famous citadel, the Acropolis of Athens, was built in Ancient Greece in the 5th century BC.
Explore history with our interactive 3D scenes. Learn about historical sites, great works of architecture or events of the past. With our apps, learning becomes a playful experience.
Our 3D scenes have been designed for students between 8 and 18 years of age but can be interesting for everyone.
Available languages: English, American English, Deutsch, Français, Español, Русский, العربية, 日本語, 中文, 한국어, Italiano, Português, Svenska, Türkçe, Nederlands, Norsk, Polski, Magyar, ελληνικά
With the mozaik3D App, available in the Google Play store, you can access more than 1200 similar 3D scenes.
Mozaik Interactive 3D
Our fully interactive scenes can be rotated, enlarged or viewed from pre-set angles.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK found in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:7e188ec8f1f3dcfba127e7d9e9d11b63e6242c183bdc683230b5b559e8c4a0b9Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "landscape"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:7e188ec8f1f3dcfba127e7d9e9d11b63e6242c183bdc683230b5b559e8c4a0b9The app's own text says: "Acropolis interactive educational VR 3D"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:7e188ec8f1f3dcfba127e7d9e9d11b63e6242c183bdc683230b5b559e8c4a0b9Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.32, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.32 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.32, updated 2026-05-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
acropolis-educational-3d-sceneAssessed 2026-10-30 from 219 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.