★★★★★It’s time to download Age of Origins now and fight your way to glory!★★★…
CamelStudioNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 14 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.3.874 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.3.874, updated 2026-09-28.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
★★★★★It’s time to download Age of Origins now and fight your way to glory!★★★★★
★★★★★Become the leader of the strongest army with the best tower defense to save the world!★★★★★
★★★★★Become the fastest action runner in history by passing through the gates to gain your honor!★★★★★
A virus is spreading throughout the world, causing the zombies to rise up and take over our homes. The land has fallen into complete chaos. Commander, we need you to help rebuild our city and lead the troops to regain control. There’s no time to waste. Let’s get started now!
Age of Origins is the most innovative war strategy game that incorporates classic tower defense and exciting hack & slash gameplay.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:41d5558d0ead3b36be2f30998ccb2ef38fd51ae4416506f76ff369297e607e6eThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.5% of 445 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.3% of 445 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
445 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
DO NOT INSTALL!!! DO NOT PLAY!!! ENDLESS MONEY PIT THAT WILL CLEAR OUT ALL YOUR POCKETS!!! This is the worst version of pay to play games I ever played, you will NEVER going to win in this game without spending money, and with progressing…
Responsible for terrible scam commercials everywhere. The game is quite fun at the start, but turns toxic fast. It starts when pay to win players start noticing you.
The game ads are nothing like game play, only a very small potion of gameplay remembers, even play store images don't match game play. The game has a heavy social element, and an even higher p2w, I am talking if you want to be…
The game ads are nothing like game play, only a very small potion of gameplay remembers, even play store images don't match game play. The game has a heavy social element, and an even higher p2w, I am talking if you want to be…
Total bait-and-switch. The ads make it look fresh and exciting, but the actual gameplay feels 10 years old—clunky, outdated, and nowhere close to what’s advertised. Graphics are way worse too. Save your time and skip it. To the…
This game is a money pit, and I wasted more money than I am willing to admit. The game is nothing like the ads, but it is enjoyable. What takes the joy out of the game are the whales (Players who ptw). They rule each nation and tend to…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.3.874, scanned 14 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.3.874 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.3.874, updated 2026-09-28.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
age-of-origins-google-com-camelgames-aozAssessed 2026-10-14 from 445 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.