Moneywalk, the global app with 8 million downloads worldwide, is now AHEALTH.
Gravity LtdSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 821 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 21 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.5.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 2.5.0, updated 2026-10-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Moneywalk, the global app with 8 million downloads worldwide, is now AHEALTH.
AHEALTH stands for All for your Health
We help you build healthy habits, and reward you for keeping them.
■ The more you use the app, the younger you get every day
Have you ever imagined getting younger each day?
Keep up with the healthy habits AHEALTH recommends for you.
AHEALTH will help you enjoy a healthy, happy life for years to come.
■ Find out your bio age
Your calendar age is just a number. Your bio age tells the real story.
AHEALTH looks at how you walk, eat, and sleep, then turns those everyday habits into your bio age.
You'll get guidance made just for you, so you can drop the habits holding you back, and do more of the ones that help.
■ The healthier you get, the more points you earn
Walk enough. Eat well. Sleep deeply.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:a417464d463f51b7e9cc1aeb2b8cac69f2dcf2d57b0b60fc9de4505197917f37Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch Ad for Water"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:a417464d463f51b7e9cc1aeb2b8cac69f2dcf2d57b0b60fc9de4505197917f37Facts that add context without being a charge.
Requests 8 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION, CAMERA, PACKAGE_USAGE_STATS, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, READ_PHONE_STATE, RECORD_AUDIO, SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW); the median for 118 scanned apps in Health & Fitness i…
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
Package artefact
sha256:a417464d463f51b7e9cc1aeb2b8cac69f2dcf2d57b0b60fc9de4505197917f37Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
821 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I gave it a try. I get ads are how they make money. But I prolly watched 100 ads in 3 days and got just over a dollar. What a waste of time.
Way too many ads to watch to get points !! points are low and take forever to collect to get anything decent
Payouts are real. Just did my second or third. I almost had the tree finished before the rebrand, but when I did finish, it is only worth about half as much. Prompts for ads are too many while collecting points. Want to watch an ad to…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.5.0, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.5.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 2.5.0, updated 2026-10-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
ahealth-google-com-tracerofficialAssessed 2026-10-21 from 821 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.