Some warnings 3 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 403 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.1.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.1.2, updated 2025-12-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Redesign your home with AI and make your dream house a reality
Interio turns your ideas into reality using advanced AI that redesigns any space with stunning accuracy. Whether you're transforming an empty room, refreshing a corner, or reimagining your entire home — Interio helps you visualize it all, effortlessly.
Key Features
Transform Your Home
Upload photos of an empty room or furnished space and instantly generate beautiful redesigns. Get side-by-side before/after comparisons powered by AI.
Exterior Design
Redesign your home’s outdoor spaces like villas, backyards, courtyards, or house facades — just upload a photo and see the transformation.
Reference Design with Style Transfer
Use any image as a style reference and match it to your own space. Just upload your inspiration photo and watch your room transform to fit the vibe.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime Access"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:e97cac603c40ef3b1745cd829d5b99b721070663e69d3f0821677ad1c90adf2eThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:e97cac603c40ef3b1745cd829d5b99b721070663e69d3f0821677ad1c90adf2eOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships session-recording SDK (Smartlook) that can replay on-screen activity
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:e97cac603c40ef3b1745cd829d5b99b721070663e69d3f0821677ad1c90adf2eShips a purchase screen ("paywall") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:e97cac603c40ef3b1745cd829d5b99b721070663e69d3f0821677ad1c90adf2eDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Time Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:e97cac603c40ef3b1745cd829d5b99b721070663e69d3f0821677ad1c90adf2eNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.1.2, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.1.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.1.2, updated 2025-12-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Hi there! In this update, we’ve fixed some bugs and enhanced the overall performance of the app. We hope you enjoy using the Interio app!
No release notes were provided for this version.
ai-interior-design-apple-6502518332Assessed 2026-10-30 from 403 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.