📸 AI Mirror is the ultimate AI-powered photo editor and video creator.
POLYVERSE INC.From our automated analysis, 9 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.1.1, updated 2026-10-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
📸 AI Mirror is the ultimate AI-powered photo editor and video creator. Instantly transform your images and videos with hundreds of AI filters and style transformations—turn snapshots into realistic studio shots, stadium broadcast photos, anime characters, birthday photos, professional headshots, or AI baby dancing videos in seconds. We’ve also fully upgraded our restoration technology with next-generation AI models, restoring old photos with sharper details, clearer faces, accurate colorization, and precise repair of scratches, fading, and damage.
AI Mirror integrates industry-leading generative models, including OpenAI, Gemini, and Nano Banana, to ensure high realism, natural lighting, accurate facial details, and consistent quality across photos and videos.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:fd840c12199e3cf5b40412d946f97f2e740e9fa763413cb21a8a198271f359cfSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 588 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Hard to cancel: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 588 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (1.9% of 588 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.9% of 588 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
588 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
false advertising AI videos dont do the same as advertised
the app promised a 7-day free trial. it charged me $5.30 immediately. it had an option for longer videos but generated the same 4-second video. false advertisement. 0 stars it used to be called pixaloop. no wonder it changed its name--to…
False advertisement all throughout this app. it says "click for free trial" but then immediately tries to charge you with zero free option.
very difficult to unsubscribe
you can't cancel your subscription no matter what you do.
I cant cancel my subscription.
Misleading Scam!! It advertised free trial then prompts you to sign up. With a free trial you are not suppose to get charged until the end of the free subscription. I was charged instantly. After charging me to sign up for a free trial…
thought i signed up for free trial but then it charged me
I subscribed for a free trial but was charged?
Absolutely pointless. You have to pay for everything. It even offers 'free' but when you click it, you get directed to payments. Dont waste your time.
I want a refund!! this game is nothing but a cash cow you've paid to download and now you have to pay to buy even more credits to do something it's insane and I want a refund
you have to pay to use the app and pay again to to use a layout.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 7.1.1, scanned 20 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.1.1, updated 2026-10-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
ai-mirror-google-com-ai-polyverse-mirrorAssessed 2026-10-09 from 588 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.