🎬AI Photo & AI Video Generator - Create AI Videos from Text & Images Turn y…
ZAppsolutionSome warnings 6 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 112 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.16 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.16, updated 2026-10-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🎬AI Photo & AI Video Generator - Create AI Videos from Text & Images
Turn your ideas into stunning videos and photos with Photo Editor Video Maker.
Generate AI videos from text or images, create beautiful slideshows, and manage all your creations in one place.
No editing skills needed — just type, upload, and let AI do the rest.
✨ KEY FEATURES
🤖 Text to Video & Image to Video
Bring your ideas to life instantly:
- Convert text into engaging AI videos
- Turn your photos into dynamic videos
- Generate videos with AI-assisted tools
🖼️ Text & Image to AI Photo
Create unique AI-generated images:
- Generate new photos from text prompts
- Transform existing images with AI
- Explore creative styles & visual ideas…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 19 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
112 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Full of adverts and alow only one try, not much interesting
Virtually impossible to use, so many adverts. Deleted after 10 minutes
too many ads and it's not worth the hassle
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.16 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.16, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
ai-photo-google-com-tomo-photo-editor-video-makerAssessed 2026-10-25 from 112 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.