Want a quick, easy, and affordable grocery shopping experience?
ALDI International Services SE & Co. oHGSome warnings 2 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 608 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 21 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 11.26.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 11.34.0, updated 2026-09-25.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Want a quick, easy, and affordable grocery shopping experience? Order ALDI from anywhere with the new and improved ALDI app. Find your local store, select pickup or delivery, fill your cart and just like that, groceries are just a click away. Download the app, sign in or create your account and get started today.
Features of the ALDI App:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 9 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d09442e1fee2a5335a03b26256c2dc41626f871f4b6da4bc9a55f8d7ec3a1333The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships 5 distinct tracking/analytics SDKs: Braze, Datadog RUM, Firebase Analytics, Meta (Facebook) SDK and 1 more
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:d09442e1fee2a5335a03b26256c2dc41626f871f4b6da4bc9a55f8d7ec3a1333Purchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:d09442e1fee2a5335a03b26256c2dc41626f871f4b6da4bc9a55f8d7ec3a1333Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 11.26.0, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 11.26.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 11.34.0, updated 2026-09-25.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
aldi-grocery-pickup-and-delivery-google-de-apptiv-business-android-aldi-usAssessed 2026-10-21 from 608 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.