Are you looking for the ultimate All Document Reader and a smart PDF Editor t…
Eternal Mobile LabsNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 15 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 4.13.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.14.1, updated 2026-10-16.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 4.13.1, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Are you looking for the ultimate All Document Reader and a smart PDF Editor to boost your productivity? You’ve found the right app!
Experience seamless document management with our integrated file viewer. Whether you need to process business records, sign contracts, or leisurely read an eBook, our app is your all-in-one Document Viewer and PDF Scanner. Handle PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and EPUB files effortlessly in one secure place!
🚀 CORE FEATURES & TOOLS:
🤖 Smart AI PDF Assistant
• AI Summary: Tired of reading long reports? Our built-in AI quickly extracts highlights and generates an accurate document summary with just one click.
• Work Efficiently: Understand complex PDF documents in seconds.
📚 Universal All Document Viewer
• Office Files: A reliable Word viewer, Excel reader, and PowerPoint viewer.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (3.7% of 437 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
437 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Does what it is supposed to, but recently started playing TONS of ads. I shouldn't have to wait 120-180 seconds to check a number on a document.
All advertising and and nothing of any use.
Used to be at least usable but now it's all ads, click the x on the ad, get another ad.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 4.13.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.14.1, updated 2026-10-16.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 4.13.1, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
No release notes were provided for this version.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
all-document-reader-google-reader-alldocuments-eternalAssessed 2026-10-15 from 437 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.