Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 3,977 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 21 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.35.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 1.35.0, updated 2026-10-20.
This analysis describes version 1.33.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-19 .
The store currently lists version 1.34.1, updated 2026-10-15.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.33.0, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Amaze GO! A clean arrow puzzle game built to calm a busy mind. Every arrow points the way — what you need to do is to choose the right order. The design cuts visual noise, reduces chaos, and helps you organize thoughts as you play. Pick up an arrow. Find its lane. Repeat until the grid is yours. Enjoy the quiet flow offline anywhere and anytime.
What makes Amaze GO! great
1. Simple arrow mechanics, zero visual noise
2. Works offline with a clean interface that keeps attention on the board
3. Calm play loop for smart brains: think clearly, move each arrow with strategy
4.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 265 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 4 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Misleading advertising: raised by 50 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The store privacy disclosure (4 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
3,977 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 265 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 4 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
great game but the "no ads" purchase is a scam. I still am forced to sit through an advertisement between EVERY level, in addition to every time I need a new life. if the number of ads was even reduced, I couldn't tell. SCAM
Have a lot of ads
It's a great game byt, far too many ads some of which go on for to long and seem impossible to exit. I'd give it 5* if the there were less ads, less repetitive ads, and ads that are shorter. How many times do I need to see the King one or…
Raised by 50 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 22 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
The add for this game was a rope untie game. Ad just completely lied about what the game was about
Fun game but false advertising — The games pretty addicting and I’ve been playing it for a while now but I agree with some other players the banner is pretty unnecessary and gets in the way when trying to move quickly. Also, I noticed the…
Decent Game 3/5 stars but only 1 for lying — Not as advertised, it’s a decent game, but the advertising boldly lied, very disappointing
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.35.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 1.35.0, updated 2026-10-20.
This analysis describes version 1.33.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-19 .
The store currently lists version 1.34.1, updated 2026-10-15.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.33.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
No release notes were provided for this version.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Optimized user experience and performance!
Optimized user experience and performance!
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
amaze-go-tmAssessed 2026-10-21 from 3,977 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.