Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.4.224 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.4.224, updated 2026-09-25.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Amy's house! The cute jungle baby needs your love, care, and attention! Raise your new leopard friend from a sweet little baby to a beautiful girl - feed, bathe, dress up and take care of Amy!
TAKE CARE OF BABY AMY
Sweet little Amy gets hungry, tired, and bored, so don't wait and take care of her! Feed her delicious foods, put her to sleep, play fun mini games, and make sure your new cute friend is happy! Bathe her with colorful soap and bath bombs, go potty, and give her cute stuffed animals to sleep with.
DRESS UP IN CUTE OUTFITS
When you take care of Amy you have to remember that she has a closet full of cute clothes and accessories! Dress Amy in sweet outfits - pick diapers for baby Amy, and tops, skirts, dresses, hair accessories, and shoes when she grows older. Make sure your new little baby friend always looks cute!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:efd9aec772e639e59943290b5c42743551b6346020f9597bf7093e42d89adceaSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 40 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Ships a purchase screen ("RESTORE PURCHASE: [") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:efd9aec772e639e59943290b5c42743551b6346020f9597bf7093e42d89adceaSells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:efd9aec772e639e59943290b5c42743551b6346020f9597bf7093e42d89adceaOffers a free trial ("3 days free trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:efd9aec772e639e59943290b5c42743551b6346020f9597bf7093e42d89adceaThe app's own text says: "Download"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:efd9aec772e639e59943290b5c42743551b6346020f9597bf7093e42d89adcea400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
My daughter downloaded this game and played it yesterday. It had so many ads she couldn't play it. She also clicked on one of the ads and it had spyware in it and seems to have stolen some of our personal information. I've tracked it to…
Hi i just love your game there is so much to do and i love how Amy grows so fast but there is so much adds but the game is very fun and cute .
I love the game but there's a lot of ads I think my Amy is older 😂 than your Amy it is good fun 😊 My Amy is 100 years old
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.4.224, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.4.224 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.4.224, updated 2026-09-25.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
amy-careAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.