Command your squad of cyber-angels and fight across the stars in this stunnin…
More Well StudioSome warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 85.1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 85.1.1, updated 2026-09-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Command your squad of cyber-angels and fight across the stars in this stunning 3D Idle Sci-Fi RPG.
⭐ COMMAND BEAUTY. CONQUER THE GALAXY.
Lead your cyber-angels into stunning 3D Sci-Fi battles and shape the destiny of the stars.
Build your elite squad, outsmart powerful enemies, and enjoy a premium Idle RPG crafted for players who demand quality, strategy, and style.
Whether you love deep hero collection, high-end visuals, or hands-free progression, Angel Legion delivers a complete next-generation Sci-Fi Idle RPG experience.
⭐ 3D Sci-Fi Idle RPG — Collect, Upgrade & Conquer
Welcome to Angel Legion — a high-quality 3D Sci-Fi Idle RPG where you recruit Sci-Fi heroines, customize your starship, and dominate a vast galaxy.
🔥 Perfect for fans of Hero Collectors, tactical RPGs, idle games, and futuristic character design.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d31f90b86098503da3b1f01ee2fa39d48da6ced03d0ed6d06a253aba8e32fb04Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 31 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Fun, but incredibly greedy, insufferable, not worth the money, pay to win. They do not value your hard earned money. These "deals" are the worse I ever seen.
The game was good once. But now there is a character that breaks the game completely. Dusk Enchantress. A character that can only be reasonably developed through payments. And it cannot be killed. At all. No matter how strong you are…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 85.1.1, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 85.1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 85.1.1, updated 2026-09-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
angel-legionAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.