AniEraser is an AI-powered photo and video editor for object removal, photo r…
Shenzhen Wondershare Software Co., Ltd.Some warnings 2 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.14 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.14, updated 2026-08-21.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
AniEraser is an AI-powered photo and video editor for object removal, photo retouching, blurry photo fixing, video enhancement, video upscaling, and old photo restoration. Edit with a tap or simple text prompts and get clean, natural-looking results without complex tools.
Why Choose AniEraser?
● Powerful Image Object Remover
Remove unwanted objects, text, and background people from photos with one tap while keeping results clean and natural.
● High-Quality Video Object Remover
Erase distracting objects from videos without frame-by-frame editing. Improved AI delivers cleaner removals with more natural-looking results.
● All-New AI Video Enhancer
Restore detail, upscale videos, and reduce noise with General, Face, and Anime models.
● One-Tap AI Photo Enhancer
Enhance sharpness, refine lighting, and bring out natural-looking details with AI.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-time purchase. Valid for 1 year.rò"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:62a9780c98727f8d275924d115a6c6fcc557f84788b444b036354fe73cd10eb5No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:62a9780c98727f8d275924d115a6c6fcc557f84788b444b036354fe73cd10eb5The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships a purchase screen ("/paywall") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:62a9780c98727f8d275924d115a6c6fcc557f84788b444b036354fe73cd10eb5Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:62a9780c98727f8d275924d115a6c6fcc557f84788b444b036354fe73cd10eb5The app's own text says: "Display download progress"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:62a9780c98727f8d275924d115a6c6fcc557f84788b444b036354fe73cd10eb5Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.2.14, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.14 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.14, updated 2026-08-21.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
anieraserAssessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.