Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
Appworthy

Animal Hunter : Wild Sniper

Step into Animal Hunter : Wild Sniper and take the shot that changes everything.

Counter Terriost
Deletion (dev says) — Developer says you can request data deletion
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating4.8★33.2K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age12+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperCounter Terriost

At a glance

Full report

Things to watch for 0

Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.

Positives 1

From our automated analysis, 15 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.2.99 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.2.99, updated 2026-10-15.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Step into Animal Hunter : Wild Sniper and take the shot that changes everything. Built for players who want more than slow, repetitive missions, this hunting experience combines stalking wild animals across detailed environments with high-pressure sniper duels that reward timing, accuracy, and control.

Travel through forests, open plains, rocky slopes, and rough wilderness where every location creates a different kind of hunt. Watch animal movement, react to distance and terrain, choose the right angle, and make every bullet count. The controls are easy to learn, but real mastery comes from patience, precision, and smart decisions under pressure.

When you want more intensity, jump into real-time sniper PvP and test your aim against other players in fast, skill-based battles. Outplay rivals with better judgment, sharper reactions, and cleaner shots.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.3% of 537 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence

Pay to progress

One source only

Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.1% of 537 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

Open evidence

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

537 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

537 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

My mobile data is fully active, not a forced ad once and I've been playinba good couple of hours now. It's bloody good fun, realistic and good incentives to upgrade thy weapons etc... Ti's a rare gem of a game... unlike other similar…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-08-28

nice there's not to many adds and competition is fun

5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-19

too many adds!!!!!!!!!

2★ · Google Play · 2026-08-17

Pay to progress

Shown, not confirmed

Yet another pay to win game. It's fun to play for the first few days, but after that point, and when you unlock and start playing events, you get matched up against people who clearly spent hundreds of real dollars on guns and ammo. Even…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-09-01

Definitely pay to win. you can make the same shots as someone else but if they have better equipment they get higher points. better shots should be determining factor on wins. second is not many scenarios. There are too few and the…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-08-13

Fun to play. I would be giving 5 stars, but sometimes you get matches with people who clearly spent money on in-game purchases for guns and ammo that make it basically impossible to beat them. When this happens it kinda takes the fun away…

3★ · Google Play · 2026-08-31

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 15 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.2.99 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.2.99, updated 2026-10-15.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 1.2.99 · 2026-10-15

No release notes were provided for this version.

Version 1.2.98 · 2026-09-08

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
animal-hunter-google-com-animal-hunting-sniper-match
Assessment date
15 Oct 2026
Sources used
1 independent signal: user reviews
Reviews read
537
Package examined
No package scan
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-15 from 537 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-15 Version analyzed: 1.2.991 independent signal537 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.75 ★ · 33,235 ratings
Version
1.2.99
Updated
15 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Counter Terriost
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction