This heartwarming management simulation game all starts with a stray cat in t…
DH-PublisherSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 404 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 12.42 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 12.42, updated 2026-10-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
This heartwarming management simulation game all starts with a stray cat in the forest.
You're the owner of Animal Restaurant. Will you take in this clumsy, dirty kitty and let him work at your restaurant?
You can learn all kinds of recipes,
like taiyaki, strawberry pancakes, shaved ice, and spaghetti!
There's even pizza and avocado sandwich!
Mix and match all styles of furniture.
We've got European-style dessert tables, Japanese-style fences, and Mediterranean-style ovens!
You can also have an Alice in Wonderland-style garden tea party!
Hire cute feline staff,
including a ragdoll cat, a tabby cat, and a big orange cat!
You've also got to get on good terms with an eccentric chef!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:60441adb4be58b60f3048958bbea3074e4afc383fb6c1e3c310d85ab586c79b9Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Watch the entire video to claim your reward"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:60441adb4be58b60f3048958bbea3074e4afc383fb6c1e3c310d85ab586c79b9No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 12.42, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 12.42 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 12.42, updated 2026-10-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
animal-restaurantAssessed 2026-10-25 from 404 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.