Some warnings 11 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 99 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.9.008 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.9.008, updated 2026-07-04.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Discover unlimited trivia fun and relaxation with Zen Quiz!
Are you looking to unwind while expanding your knowledge? Zen Quiz is your perfect companion!
In Zen Quiz, the journey is more important than the destination. There are no levels, no competitions, and no pressure – just pure relaxation and learning at your own pace.
You just go from question to question, read interesting stories behind the right answers and calm down.
If you need to unwind or want to take a general knowledge quiz without additional features or game elements, Zen Quiz is your perfect choice!
KEY GAME FEATURES
- Unlimited trivia questions
- Antistress design
- No time limits
- No competitions
- Detailed explanations
In addition to providing stress relief and relaxation, Zen Quiz offers detailed explanations for each answer. You can expand your knowledge and learn something new with every question.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 0.49 to USD 14.99 — a 31x spread across 8 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 9 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
99 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Ugh!! TOO MANY ADS!! — This could have been one of the best trivia games in the entire App Store. Unfortunately the STRESSFUL & TIME-CONSUMING ADS made it unbearable! The game was relaxing but the ads were frustrating—too many and they…
Fun — Too many ads. I don’t want to pay.
Great but… — As you get higher and higher in the levels the ads are more frequent. Three ads in 10 questions is ridiculous, and you have to click off multiple screens to get out of the ad. Great way to spoil the continuation of the game…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.9.008 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.9.008, updated 2026-07-04.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
In this update, we've focused on enhancing your gaming experience by implementing several bug fixes and performance improvements. Thank you for your continued support and feedback as we strive to make our game the best it can be!
Appworthy
antistress-triviaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 99 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.