App Store rating2.0★4 ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age4+Store age rating
Size60 MBiPhone download
CategoryLifestyle

What we found

Full report

Too little checked to say Store information only. We haven’t analysed this app or read its reviews yet.

Money

  • Free to download.

Not yet tested.

The store currently lists version 5.1.8, updated 2026-10-27.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

在鸭觅App中,我们诚挚邀请了多名美食推荐官来为小伙伴们做餐厅遴选。这些推荐官们均满足以下特点:

○ 吃得足够多,他们吃过的餐厅数量是普通人的10倍甚至更多,“见多方能识广”,我们相信吃得多的人在餐厅辨别上更有话语权。

○ 吃得足够广,无论在价格区间还是品类分布上。见过好的食材、料理,也愿意包容创新,我们相信这样的推荐官更能为大家找出深藏在街头巷尾、值得一吃的美食。

○ 有自己的本职工作,不以探店为主业或赖此获得主要经济收入。因前序的“吃多”、“吃广”这两项条件对应的“高恩格尔系数”需要相当的经济支撑,这些推荐官们大多在现实世界中有着受人尊敬、收入丰厚的工作,自付餐费也使得他们能够相对客观和无负担地给出评价。

当然,在这其中我们也明白“人有所长”的道理,在特定品类的餐厅(例如咖啡、酒吧、日料)遴选上,我们也给予了推荐官不同的权重,让推荐官在自己熟悉和擅长的品类中拥有更大的影响力,这也有助于我们选出单品类下最优秀的那些餐厅。

我们将推荐官们给出的推荐餐厅按照就餐场景、品类、地理位置等因素整理成了餐厅专辑和“金勺子”餐厅目录。

按推荐程度,金勺子餐厅分为三档:

-【三勺-值得专程去吃】:约占本地餐厅的0.1%,是鸭觅的推荐官们大都给予高评价的餐厅。

-【两勺-值得绕路去吃】:约占本地餐厅的0.3%,是多位美食推荐官推荐的餐厅。

-【一勺-值得顺路去吃】:约占本地餐厅的1%,是部分美食推荐官推荐的餐厅。

期望借此,大家都能在本地,尝到由推荐官们严选出的、全城前1%的好味道。

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

Not yet tested
Not yet tested. No analysis has been published for this app. A missing label is not a clean bill of health.

What reviewers report

No review coverage

No review analysis published for this app.

Measurements

3 measured · 5 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Not assessed
Fewer than 50 reviews scanned — too few to state a rate
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
Not assessed
This app's reviews have not been assessed yet
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Not yet tested

Not yet tested. No analysis has been run for this app, so there is no version or date to report.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 5.1.8 · 2026-10-27
在鸭觅App中,我们诚挚邀请了多名美食推荐官来为小伙伴们做餐厅遴选。这些推荐官们均满足以下特点: ○ 吃得足够多,他们吃过的餐厅数量是普通人的10倍甚至更多,“见多方能识广”,我们相信吃得多的人在餐厅辨别上更有话语权。 ○ 吃得足够广,无论在价格区间还是品类分布上。见过好的食材、料理,也愿意包容创新,我们相信这样的推荐官更能为大家找出深藏在街头巷尾、值得一吃的美食。 ○ 有自己的本职工作,不以探店为主业或赖此获得主要经济收入。因前序的“吃多”、“吃广”这两项条件对应的“高恩格尔系数”需要相当的经济支撑,这些推荐官们大多在现实世界中有着受人尊敬、收入丰厚的工作,自付餐费也使得他们能够相对客观和无负担地给出评价。 当然,在这其中我们也明白“人有所长”的道理,在特定品类的餐厅(例如咖啡、酒吧、日料)遴选上,我们也给予了推荐官不同的权重,让推荐官在自己熟悉和擅长的品类中拥有更大的影响力,这也有助于我们选出单品类下最优秀的那些餐厅。 我们将推荐官们给出的推荐餐厅按照就餐场景、品类、地理位置等因素整理成了餐厅专辑和“金勺子”餐厅目录。 按推荐程度,金勺子餐厅分为三档: -【三勺-值得专程去吃】:约占本地餐厅的0.1%,是鸭觅的推荐官们大都给予高评价的餐厅。 -【两勺-值得绕路去吃】:约占本地餐厅的0.3%,是多位美食推荐官推荐的餐厅。 -【一勺-值得顺路去吃】:约占本地餐厅的1%,是部分美食推荐官推荐的餐厅。 期望借此,大家都能在本地,尝到由推荐官们严选出的、全城前1%的好味道。

Assessment record

Status
Not yet tested
App identifier
apple-6739762511
Sources used
None recorded
Reviews read
None recorded
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed
How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
2.00 ★ · 4 ratings
Version
5.1.8
Updated
27 Oct 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
4+
Size
60 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
Beijing Baobao Eat Better Food and Dining Management Co., Ltd.
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

What a missing label means

Not yet tested. No analysis has been published for this app, so there is no method to describe for it yet. A missing label is not a clean bill of health: it means nothing has been read, not that nothing is wrong.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A human review gives an app hands-on, recorded measurements. None has been run for this app. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.