Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 445 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Avatar: Realms Collide

Tilting Point

Winner of Pocket Gamer’s 2026 Best Strategy Game of the Year!

4.5 ★28,989 ratings
1M+Downloads
9+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Winner of Pocket Gamer’s 2026 Best Strategy Game of the Year!

A New Story Set in the Avatar Universe The harmony of the Four Nations is threatened. A powerful cult from the Spirit World rises, spreading chaos and threatening everything the Avatars once protected.

As chaos looms, you must rise as a leader, gathering heroes from across generations to stand against the growing darkness and restore balance to the world. Classic heroes. New faces. One epic story.

Award Winning 4X Strategy Game Step into the world of Avatar: The Last Airbender and The Legend of Korra in this epic 4X strategy mobile game. Explore iconic locations, expand your city, exploit resources, and exterminate powerful enemies as you fight to restore balance to the Four Nations.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 1
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 2
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 3
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 4
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 5
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 6
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 7
Avatar: Realms Collide screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 1.7.1011 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.7.1011, updated 2026-09-30.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (3.8% of 445 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“p2w scam. moreso than others. Look we understand ads and micro transactions. but there are entire sections of the game locked behind pay walls. if you're going to charge for "DLC" then you can't be doing all of the other things at the…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-27
Pay to progress
“Developers ruin the game. They only add more and more P2W items, and charging millions for them. They know the game is close to dying completely, so why not make as much money as possible while they still can, right?”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-14
Pay to progress
“your typical lords mobile or mafia city style conquest game but I like em and if you like both avatar and that style of game you'll like this but of course be ready for it to be pay to win or clan heavy for any utility for later building…”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-05-02

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 1.7.1011.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.