Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,047 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer

Miniclip.com

Real-time 3D Basketball Game

4.7 ★2,102,995 ratings
100M+Downloads
4+Age rating
247 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

The world’s best multiplayer Basketball game on mobile, from the creators of multiple smash-hit online sports games!

Dribble, shoot, score, WIN! Grab the ball and forge your Basketball career in this 3D Real-time Sport Game!

Play fast-paced, authentic 1v1 multiplayer basketball! Show your skills, moves and fakes to juke out your opponent and shoot for the basket! On defense, stay in the face of the attacker, steal the ball, and time your leaps to block their shots! All in REAL-TIME!

REALISTIC 3D GRAPHICS Basketball on mobile has never looked this good: fully customisable 3D players and a variety of environments to play in!

COMPETE 1v1 IN TWO AWESOME MULTIPLAYER GAME MODES Test your duelling instincts in 1v1 Attacker-Defender Matches, or race to shoot hoops in time-based 1v1 Shootouts.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 1
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 2
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 3
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 4
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 5
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 6
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 7
Basketball Stars™: Multiplayer screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 3.1.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.1.4, updated 2026-09-04.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.1.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.1.4, updated 2026-09-03.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 3.1.4, scanned 2026-09-22.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact e4d2d6a9f2f0…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 9 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 5 more

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

From the store listing: Loot boxes with no stated odds
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store listing.view evidence
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
What we saw: The store lists 1 randomised-reward purchase ("Golden Spin") and the app's own text states no drop rates or odds
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.5% of 525 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“Screw this trash game — Soon as im about to make it to allstars it starts making me lag and letting down block me after i already got a shot passed them. Its pay to win and F these devs if i saw them in real life id blast”
1★ · App Store · 2026-04-07
Pay to progress
“Pay to win — Tried this game and it was really fun at first. But then I lost all my money because the game put me up against really good players that were double my skill. Fun at first though. PAY TO WIN WOULD NOT RECOMMEND”
1★ · App Store · 2026-03-11
Pay to progress
“Unfair — I 100% agree with everybody you play for a little bit and then you lose over and over and over the pay to win and play for fun difference is crazy. You get matched up with people who have maxed stats and it doesn’t matter how…”
1★ · App Store · 2026-02-07

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.1.4.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.