Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.35 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.35, updated 2026-08-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
What is that smell?
Welcome! The hot tycoon game you ordered has arrived!
From now on, start a delightful day with adorable animal friends.
A small bakery in my hand Bear Bakery
Manager! Bakery, please!
This is how Bakery works!
★ Create new bread using Merge!
Make various breads using Merge!
What kind of bread will be Merge's next step!?
★ Decorate the best wellness room!
We need a break room for the well-being of our employees!
Buy furniture with Bakery profits to decorate your employees' break rooms!
When they eat well and get plenty of rest, your employees' performance will increase!
★ The life of the Bakery is bread!
Bakery's life is a variety of delicious breads.
Merge Tycoon makes several loaves of bread!
★ Know what your customers like!
Customers have different personalities and preferences!
Customer's style! Please identify your favorite bread and make it a regular!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 7 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network and 3 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:ba4884afbf636dde3a70f797e6d34ebf8809a180f5c8fdd32942d6a08d0b4345Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 35 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 11 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I've had this game for years now, and it was great. Very cute merge style game, with cool themed events and fun characters. However, they pushed an increase in full screen mandatory ads that interrupt game play every like 15 seconds on…
It 's a fun game with cute character and in-game item designs. However, what sucks regarding it are: 1. Forced ads once every minute or so 2. Game keeps crashing after maybe 5 minutes or so of playtime. The song keeps playing after I've…
super cute and fun idea. but theres intrusive full screen ads every few minutes, makes it hard to keep things in stock, plus the price for a new oven is 1.5k coins, investing that much time when I'm rudely interrupted feels pointless…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.2.35, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.35 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.35, updated 2026-08-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
bear-bakeryAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.