Serious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 188 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.9, updated 2025-12-17.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🌟 Beast's Creed: Idle RPG 🌟
▶Dive in – zero grind, all glory.
AFK while your mythic beasts battle, loot, and level up. Log back in stronger every time. 🛌
▶Collect epic beasts.
Tame dragons, phoenixes, – 100+ adorable yet fierce companions with unique powers and bond stories. 🦊
▶Explore a stunning world.
Roam misty mountains, glowing forests, and endless seas. Day-night cycles, hidden secrets, breathtaking views. 🌄
▶Build your beast haven.
Craft a chill sanctuary, grow spirit herbs, invite friends. Your beasts farm for you offline. 🏡
▶Team up & dominate.
Join global guilds, raid bosses, climb PvP ranks. Your oath, your legend. ⚔️
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The app's own text says: "1.Tdollar are universal tokens for purchasing virtual goods in games. Currently, they can be used to purchase recharge slots and gift packs"
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:88cfa1ed82dd546fcbc9782094876c208bd2186ffe3b9a1813449057c9c34c41Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:88cfa1ed82dd546fcbc9782094876c208bd2186ffe3b9a1813449057c9c34c41The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a randomised reward ("Pack Contents") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:88cfa1ed82dd546fcbc9782094876c208bd2186ffe3b9a1813449057c9c34c41Offers a trial ("Quick Play users are supposed to prepare retained screenshots") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:88cfa1ed82dd546fcbc9782094876c208bd2186ffe3b9a1813449057c9c34c41The app's own text says: "Guest"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:88cfa1ed82dd546fcbc9782094876c208bd2186ffe3b9a1813449057c9c34c41Misleading advertising: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 24 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
188 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
typical run of the mill p2w game, don't bother.
vip status : PAY TO WIN GAMES
p2w game
The ad that brought me to this game is SO different 🤣. Even if I were to end up enjoying this game (I didn't), I would still rate it 1 star anyway for false advertising.
I'm very mad right now, I spent a few in game purchases, made me strong, then all of a sudden my account was never found, take note that I linked it to my google account so how can it disappear suddenly and I have proof of transaction on…
ad said i could us codes but then I go in to game and codes dont work false advertisement
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.0.9, scanned 31 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.9, updated 2025-12-17.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
beast-s-creed-google-com-ynsh-en-googleAssessed 2026-10-31 from 188 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.