An application that teaches hijaiyah letters interactively accompanied by the…
Indocipta StudioSome warnings 1 thing we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 157 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.8.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.8.1, updated 2025-10-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
An application that teaches hijaiyah letters interactively accompanied by their pronunciation.
Application features:
* Display and pronounce hijaiyah letters.
* Game to remember hijaiyah letters with various levels of difficulty.
* Quiz to find specific hijaiyah letters.
* Coloring of hijaiyah letters.
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:06e08d5485b381677d9f84e68557a5e542611b18cc75b565f18f938a105674a8The app's own text says: "No thanks"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:06e08d5485b381677d9f84e68557a5e542611b18cc75b565f18f938a105674a8The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:06e08d5485b381677d9f84e68557a5e542611b18cc75b565f18f938a105674a8Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.8.1, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.8.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.8.1, updated 2025-10-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
belajar-huruf-hijaiyahAssessed 2026-10-27 from 157 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.