Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreeHard to cancel: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 56 reviews we read)
Definition
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Serious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 2 more things. Checked: 900 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.33.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 7.33.0, updated 2026-10-15.
This analysis describes version 4.59.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 4.59.0, updated 2026-10-07.




Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
BetterMe: Mental Health—an all-in-one app for your mental well-being, offering meditations, courses, and other tools.
Mindfulness is key to a balanced life, and BetterMe offers simple, practical relaxation methods for everyone, whether you're just starting out or already a pro. Dive into guided practices and start discovering your inner peace today—let's embrace the good vibes together!
Teaming up with mental health experts, we have used effective tools and strategies from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to help you tune in to the world surrounding you.
Incorporate mindfulness into your daily routine through guided meditations, stress-relief practices, breathwork, sleep meditations, and hundreds of mental health exercises. When your mind is clear, you concentrate better, feel inspired, and get more life energy.
Just a few minutes can really boost your well-being.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Hard to cancel: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 56 reviews we read)
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime Access"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395dNo advertising or mediation SDK among the 10 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395dThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 36 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
The app's own text says: "Get Unlimited Access"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395dPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395dSurprise charges: raised by 23 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "Continue without registration"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395dThe app's own text says: "Download Again"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:5cf4477cb4764dc2843fc7a1c37ba414a9f072a1ede66ce29247dfa09d88395d900 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I'm unable to cancel my subscription. I don't see any option to cancel it in my profile, and it's not listed under my Google account either. However, I'm still being charged every 28 days.
Impossible to cancel — They purposely make this very difficult to cancel. I canceled through APP after first week of usage as the app did not suite me. Continued to be billed the following year. Was told i actually subscribed via website…
Careful! — This app will automatically renew despite not showing up in your App Store list with no way to cancel. I did go in the app itself to cancel it, but it STILL renewed at over $50!! Can’t find anything to show for how long…
its no good if i have to sign up for you to automatically charge my card when the free trial runs out just to see what the app is like and whether or not its worth the money.
Scam — I wouldn’t even begin to consider downloading this app. They’ll offer you a free trial then next thing you know you’re getting charged for a month’s subscription. Then when you cancel that subscription, guess what? You’ll still be…
Ivj — For now 2 years I have been trying to get my 7 days free trial and every single time it tries and charge my card 6.95$ on the first day of a free
not great, robotic voices for meditation 😞😞 distracting and not relaxing. It takes a large amount of time which is not always possible - constant throughout the day. I didn't get what I thought I was signing up for - customer support…
I'm unable to cancel my subscription. I don't see any option to cancel it in my profile, and it's not listed under my Google account either. However, I'm still being charged every 28 days.
Scam — This app charged me twice when I already canceled my subscription
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 4.59.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.33.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 7.33.0, updated 2026-10-15.
This analysis describes version 4.59.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 4.59.0, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Not a ton of updates today. Just polished some rough edges to make the app even better for you.
No release notes were provided for this version.
bettermeAssessed 2026-10-27 from 900 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.