Alphabet tracing & phonics 2-5
Bibi.Pet - Toddlers Games - Colors and ShapesSome warnings 2 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 171 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.0, updated 2026-08-24.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Bibi ABC has arrived — the simple and fun way for your child to learn the alphabet!
The games in the app are designed to help your child get familiar with both writing and reading. Through lots of engaging educational activities, kids will start recognizing and memorizing letters with ease.
All the games are simple and perfectly suited for preschoolers. Children can also hear the correct pronunciation of each letter in different languages, thanks to the helpful audio.
In this amazing adventure, the Super Bibi.Pets will be right there with you — guiding your child through every letter of the alphabet!
Key Features:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 4 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:891898a871d56b238e93a5c566a1bf54a7c4ea12895ac46e60a338760b8319f8The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:891898a871d56b238e93a5c566a1bf54a7c4ea12895ac46e60a338760b8319f8Ships a purchase screen ("Restore purchase item not found") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:891898a871d56b238e93a5c566a1bf54a7c4ea12895ac46e60a338760b8319f8The app's own text says: "Not working yet, sorry."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:891898a871d56b238e93a5c566a1bf54a7c4ea12895ac46e60a338760b8319f8Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.0, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.0, updated 2026-08-24.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Big news from Bibi.Pet! Why pick just one game when you can have them all? Starting today, one subscription unlocks this app, the entire BibiLand universe, and every other app in the BibiLand series! • Always growing: 7 worlds to discover (with many more on the way!) • Learn through play: Cook, drive, explore shapes, colors, and so much more • Total freedom: Play offline in a safe, ad-free environment
No release notes were provided for this version.
bibi-abc-letter-games-for-kidsAssessed 2026-10-30 from 171 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.