Some warnings 5 users report having to pay to progress; 6 users report ads that misrepresent the app. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 502 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.5.9 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.5.9, updated 2026-10-21.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Bingo Wild!
Embark on a wild bingo adventure! Explore exciting destinations, join live bingo tournaments, and discover a world filled with amazing animals. Start your journey with Leo the Lion and see where the adventure takes you next!
Bingo Wild combines classic 75-ball bingo with special bingo cards, exciting challenges, collectible puzzles, and fun mini-games. Whether you enjoy classic bingo or competing in live tournaments, there is always something new to explore.
1. BINGO CARDS
TWO TYPES OF CARDS: Enjoy classic bingo cards and special bingo cards with unique gameplay experiences. Play classic 75-ball bingo and explore 13 different ways to win.
CHOOSE YOUR CARDS: Play with 1, 2, or 4 bingo cards at a time. Choose your preferred challenge and test your bingo skills!
POWER-UPS: Use 7 different power-ups to enhance your bingo experience.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 19.99 — a 20x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 84 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Pay to progress: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 100 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
The store privacy disclosure (10 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
502 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
False advertisement — I played this game in an advertisement it states you never need to make a purchase … FALSE!!! If you want to play you need to purchase after the firstso many levels. So players be careful if you came to play this…
Where’s the 100,000 coins — I downloaded this game to get the 100,000 coins it only gave 10,000 coins. And I have to pay for everything. Sorry I’m not rich! This is false advertising.
They withdrew my coins from my account — I started playing this game in August/September 2022, because their advertisement said that they paid out enough to keep you playing. NOT TRUE, you must purchase coins in order to play. Plus as you…
Good…. BUT — I enjoy playing this game. Great graphics and a wide array of bingo games. BUT, I have learned through a costly learning curve, NOT to rush to climb levels, get extra bonuses or rewards. They will come eventually. I play to…
Impassible! — It is impossible to win. You can only play like once a week, because you never get enough coins. I love playing this game, the problem is, I can never play. It’s super hard to win, and you NEVER get enough coins! And is…
GREAT GAME - COSTS TOO MUCH — This is a fun game and I love it. The bad part, unless you have hundreds of dollars to pay for coins, you won’t be able to play much. For example - you pay almost $10000 in coins to play one game of Bingo. If…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.5.9 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.5.9, updated 2026-10-21.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Update SDK
Stability improvements and crash fixes
Appworthy
bingo-wild-apple-1542926387Assessed 2026-10-27 from 502 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.