“false advertisement and scam. don't waste ur money on the women. most of them aren't verified and most likely keb pretending to be women. I have downloaded this app and another g called glimr. on both apps there are two girls that I've…”
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 452 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
Blazing: Ignite Your Love Life
Yala Yala Technology Company LimitetdBlazing - the sizzling social app that is revolutionizing your love life!
4.2 ★47,196 ratings
1M+Downloads
17+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
Blazing - the sizzling social app that is revolutionizing your love life! Blazing is designed to cater to diverse individuals with varying interests, providing more than just a typical platform for swiping left and right. We offer a variety of features to help you find meaningful connections that ignite your life's passions. Our instant messaging allows you to communicate with your matches in real-time, making it easy to build a deeper connection with the people you're interested in.
Safety is our top priority in the world of online dating. We have a team actively monitoring for suspicious activity and fake profiles. Blazing uses the latest encryption technology to protect your personal information and we have a strict policy against harassment and abuse. Our community is made up of like-minded adults over the age of 18, where you can be yourself and find genuine connections.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
Evidence and review signals
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
This analysis describes version 1.5.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.5.4, updated 2026-09-23.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (4.0% of 452 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.8% of 452 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“The ad is somewhat misleading. Now, they are true to speaking to real girls and free to chat. However, after awhile, they through in a fee to continue. I was talking to this girl for awhile and it was sexy but then a fee to continue. I…”
“it's advertised as being free but when you go on the app you have to pay for it so it's not free it's false advertisement”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.5.4.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.