Block Puzzle - Jewel Blast, the lovely game where Jewel Block and Block Puzzl…
Flyfox GamesSome warnings 19 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.27 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.27, updated 2025-11-27.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Block Puzzle - Jewel Blast, the lovely game where Jewel Block and Block Puzzle come together to make the amazing Jewel Block Puzzle Game. It not only provides a relaxing and cozy block puzzle game experience but also enhances your logical abilities and make your brain train with each block puzzle.
Ready to play levels full of shiny jewel blocks and fun block puzzles? Let's explore the exciting game world of Block Puzzle - Jewel Blast!
Block Puzzle Jewel Blast Adventure Starts Now!
1. Jewel Block Crush Match-3: Collect a variety of colorful elements to meet the requirements of each block puzzle, use various items to overcome obstacles along the way in block puzzles, then finally progress through the enchanting adventure map of block puzzle!
2. Classic Sudoku Block Puzzle: Get smart with jewel block placing in this cool Sudoku-style block puzzle.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 21 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Love this game. The ads are a little excessive. The levels keep going so you don't have to start all over every time.
Two long, timed ads for other games before this even opens to play. Two more ads after every 20 second level. I didn't give it a chance to start saying I need a "break" to another couple of ads 10 seconds into each 20 second round, but I…
I used Hero Wars tap joy to install and play this. but they never gave me rewards. also too many ads. Bad game, wouldn't recommend.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.27 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.27, updated 2025-11-27.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
block-puzzle-google-block-puzzle-jewel-adventureAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.