Appworthy
Pay to progress
Reported by 32 usersPay to progress: raised by 32 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 16 reviews we read)
Definition
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
App Store rating4.4★35.3K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $0.99–$99.99
Age9+Store age rating
Size520 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames
DeveloperGVERSE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
What we found
Full reportSerious warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 519 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
Money
- Free to download · in-app purchases $0.99–$99.99 (10 listed, the most the App Store shows). Monthly plans $0.99 (about $12 a year), $4.99 (about $60 a year), $9.99 (about $120 a year) and $24.99 (about $300 a year). The other purchases’ names don’t say how often they bill.
- Pay to progressConfirmed · reported by 32 users
- If you subscribe through the store, cancel in iPhone Settings → your name → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.30.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.30.1, updated 2026-10-22.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
Communicate with players from all over the world in Blockman Go. It is a good choice for making friends and holding a party with your friends.
Multiplayer Games and Global Service
- Globalization, play with friends from all over the world.
- Challenging mode, work with other players to finish the tasks!
- Beats other teams to achieve higher achievements with your team.
- Support 50 players in a game at the same time. That's the best chance to get to know new friends.
Multiple online modes and richer gaming experience
- Egg War Mode
- Bed War Mode
- Parkour Mode
- Hidden and Seek Mode
......
Compete with other players in multiple modes and become the finally winner！ Variety of game modes, Shooting, fighting, racing, casual games...…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
Things to watch for 1
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Open evidence
Context 1
Facts that add context without being a charge.
Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredIn-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 99.99 — a 101x spread across 10 items
Definition
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Usable without an account
One source onlyThe store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What reviewers report
519 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Pay to progress
Published findingRaised by 32 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 16 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Why the game died — This is my childhood game if yall see this not automatic bots like developers or someone that works for blockmango I hope yall make it non pay to win again like the old times im not some bot im a normal human being…
P2W problems — This game used to be fair according to YouTube but now that I’m good at bedwars I get eliminated first because of people buying runes and soulstones with money making the game unfair I will start a blackout if necessary so…
pay to win — es muy pay to win literalmente hya gente que paga y les dan casi 1 un aespada de diamante de inicio
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description says how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 3.30.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.30.1, updated 2026-10-22.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
App Store
Version 3.30.1 · 2026-10-22
Event Optimization
Version 3.28.1 · 2026-09-07
Event Optimization
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
blockman-go-apple-1426189000- Assessment date
- 27 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
- Reviews read
- 519
- Package examined
- No package scan
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-27 from 519 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 3.30.13 independent signals519 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
App Store
- Store rating
- 4.37 ★ · 35,280 ratings
- Version
- 3.30.1
- Updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 9+
- Size
- 520 MB
- Developer
- GVERSE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
- Category
- Games
- Listing price
- Free · In-app purchases
Purchases the store lists
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Subscriptions4
1 month VIP subscriptMonthly$0.99
1 month VIP+ subscriptMonthly$4.99
1 month MVP subscriptMonthly$9.99
1 month MVP+ subscriptMonthly$24.99
Show 6 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
60GcubeTerm not stated$0.99
300GcubeTerm not stated$4.99
600GcubeTerm not stated$9.99
1650GcubeTerm not stated$24.99
3600GcubeTerm not stated$49.99
8400GcubeTerm not stated$99.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.