Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 2,127 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary

NetEase Games

Action-packed FPS For All

4.3 ★1,126,656 ratings
100M+Downloads
12+Age rating
720 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

[New Gameplay: Overdrive] 1. Go all out in “Overdrive,” a brand-new Mode with faster pacing and more intense combat. 2. Oddities are here! Piñata Drop crates and hot spring zones will appear randomly during the match — explore them to grab fun, all-new tactical Items!

[Welfare Events] [Log in to claim P90 Ultra Skin]: The Neon Shard series returns! Complete the login Mission to receive the Ultra-grade P90 – Neon Shard, completely free!

Blood Strike is a battle royale game available on multiple platforms. With its fast-paced matches, smooth optimization and characters with distinctive abilities, the game has won the hearts of nearly 100 million players globally.

Join the players worldwide in redefining tactical combat NOW!

【Well optimized, Any Device】 Silky controls meet HD visuals! Master mobile-native moves like recoil control and slide-shoot combos.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 1
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 2
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 3
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 4
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 5
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 6
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 7
Blood Strike: 2.5 Anniversary screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 1.003.160 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.003.160, updated 2026-09-24.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 1.003.650025 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-09-28.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.003.650025, scanned 2026-09-25.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 699d539386b3…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (1.9% of 465 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“add skill based matchmaking!! — the game is well optimized and not pay to win however the matchmaking system is trash and ruins the game they’ll keep match u with bots against pros specially in squad fight if u don’t have a team to play…”
2★ · App Store · 2026-09-01
Pay to progress
“Pay to win — To the developers of Blood Strike, What you're doing in your game is no longer just an imbalance; it's blatant exploitation of players. Your current "Pay to Win" system gives those who pay an immediate advantage in combat…”
1★ · App Store · 2026-04-18
Pay to progress
“Very nice — Probably one of the best battle royale Expensive gotcha pay to win skins. Lobby full of bots.”
3★ · App Store · 2026-02-13

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 1.003.160.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.