Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 403 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.25.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 0.25.0, updated 2026-05-06.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
PUBLIC BETA Available!
Can you make an old boba store successful?
This cute shop management simulation game starts with you making strawberry bubble tea with boba pearls for yourself. Joji, a strawberry forest spirit, shows up and needs your help to restore their old shop.
Can you show these adorable spirits and animals why this drink is so special?
You can create all kinds of drinks with ingredients like blueberry popping boba, custard pudding, taro tea, lychee jelly, and red bean!
You can even add froggy, bunny, cat, and axolotl lids to your drinks!
Brew tea, shake some bubbles, fill your cup with tapioca pearls and jelly, and catch falling fruit and cheese foam in mini-games to get boosts for your custom drinks!
Mix and match furniture and windows.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 7 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 3 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:9e02402ca3f355a58f37645dd46314283c5fcf18ba54b02a89a8e0833caeeaa0Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch Ad for 3"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:9e02402ca3f355a58f37645dd46314283c5fcf18ba54b02a89a8e0833caeeaa0Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:9e02402ca3f355a58f37645dd46314283c5fcf18ba54b02a89a8e0833caeeaa0The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:9e02402ca3f355a58f37645dd46314283c5fcf18ba54b02a89a8e0833caeeaa0403 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I've "completed" the game twice so far (quotes, because there isn't necessarily an actual *end* to the game!) and I very much enjoy the gameplay! Gameplay wise, it's similar to other games like Animal Restaurant. I didn't run into too…
it took awhile to load and it had tons of ads it is really boring you don't even make boba
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 0.25.0, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.25.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 0.25.0, updated 2026-05-06.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
boba-storyAssessed 2026-10-25 from 403 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.