Too little checked to say Only 364 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 3.0.118 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.118, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The app your book club deserves. Start, manage or join a book club with ease. Set up your online or in-person club with digital bookshelves, polls, meetings, member management and more.
Meetups made easy!
- Easily schedule and manage events
- Send reminders and track attendance
- Sync with your personal calendar
- Lead a great discussion with book club questions
Vote on what's next
- Poll members on what to read (including ranked choice voting!)
- Choose meeting dates and times
- Coordinate your potluck
Keep tabs on your reads
- Never wonder what the club is reading next
- View your reading history
- Share book recommendations
Stay connected
- Chat on your club message board
- DM individuals or groups
- Easily create chats with meeting attendees…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 1.99 to USD 229.00 — a 115x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.0.118 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.118, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
This release contains several bug fixes and improvements.
Appworthy
bookclubsAssessed 2026-10-27 from 364 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.