Brainrut: AR Filter & Fun Call

🧠 Brainrut: AR Filter & Fun Call Bring viral brainrut characters into your w…

TSACom
Google Play rating4.7★18K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age12+Store age rating
CategoryPhoto & Video
DeveloperTSACom

What we found

Full report

Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 229 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.

Money

  • Free to download.

Ads

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 2.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 2.5, updated 2025-12-15.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

🧠 Brainrut: AR Filter & Fun Call

Bring viral brainrut characters into your world with AR!

See iconic memes come alive in your room, then prank your friends with fake calls and chats!

🔥 Features:

📸 AR Filters with Viral Characters – Summon famous meme icons into real life using your camera.

📞 Fake Prank Calls – Call your friends as chaotic, trending characters.

💬 Funny Fake Chats – Craft wild convos with meme legends.

🕺 Dancing in AR – Watch brainrut stars dance in your space!

Perfect for pranksters, meme lords, and anyone whose brain is already half-melted.

Download Brainrut now and let the chaos invade your reality. 📲💥

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

3 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 2

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Multiple ad networks bundled

Measured

Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:830649cea98f7566f0c55ae7b4dceb681a8f407c5b988d3d53375bc5cf2c199c

Aggressive ad load

2 independent sources agree

Aggressive ad load: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 23 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews and the app's own on-screen text
Agreement
2 independent kinds of source agree.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From Google Play reviews
Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
4.4% of the 229 reviews read.

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text and the store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Works offline

One source only

The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:830649cea98f7566f0c55ae7b4dceb681a8f407c5b988d3d53375bc5cf2c199c

What reviewers report

229 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

229 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Published finding

Its fake so many ads I hate ads I thought it was offline and it's not offline and why is smurf cat there?????

1★ · Google Play · 2024-02-06

theres to much adds and everything on the screen so you can't see anything 😔

4★ · Google Play · 2024-02-02

DONT PLAY THIS GAME 1 THERES TO MANY ADS 2 THE PUT THE ADS ON THE SCREEN MAKING IT UNPLAYABLE 3 YOU CANT MAKE YOUR ON TEXTS 4 THIS GAME WASTES YOUR TIME 5 THIS GAME NEEDS YOU TO CONNECT TO THE WI-FI JUST TO GIVE YOU ADS NOT FOR IMPORTANT…

1★ · Google Play · 2024-02-03

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 2.5, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
3–5 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 2.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 2.5, updated 2025-12-15.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 2.5 · 2025-12-15

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
brainrut
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
5 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing
Reviews read
229
Package examined
Android · 2.5 · scanned 27 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 229 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 2.55 independent signals229 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing. Not yet checked: the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.69 ★ · 17,961 ratings
Version
2.5
Updated
15 Dec 2025
Price
Free
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
TSACom
Category
Photo & Video
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.