Scientific Calculator With History - The Perfect Tool for Every Math Lover!
Prometheus Interactive LLCFrom our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 9.1.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Scientific Calculator With History - The Perfect Tool for Every Math Lover!
Are you looking forward to making your Math calculations easier for complex math tasks? Our tool has all your bases covered. Well, you do not need to worry about anything - if it is a Scientific Calculator With History, a Basic Calculator App, a Graphing calculator, or A fractional app, we have got your back.
This application also supports Wear OS devices!
📄Our Calculation Tool Key Features:📄
🧮Scientific Calculator with History: It can perform any scientific operations like Trigonometric, Logarithmic, and Exponential functions, etc. It also reviews History as a Scientific Calculator with history. See your last 100 expressions and answers with dates, which means you can easily track what is used to calculate the result.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 8 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 4 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:46829bee18e7ec8d66d3d5867eabb9e2817dc50aa1dafef5cdefa75dd84d32c2Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 23 distinct reviewers (3.8% of 599 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited time offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:46829bee18e7ec8d66d3d5867eabb9e2817dc50aa1dafef5cdefa75dd84d32c2599 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Can't use it due to the ads and it wants £14.99 A WEEK to remove the ads. who's paying £780 a year to use a calculator app 😂
LUDACRIS!!!! if I could give less stars I would. 800 bucks a year unless you want a. unskippable ad 30 second ad upon every open. upon every calculation and everything in between. do you know how many better, useful and important- even…
too many ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 9.1.8, scanned 10 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 9.1.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
calculator-google-apps-r-calculatorAssessed 2026-10-10 from 599 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.